Open Access
Issue
2012
Article Number 02003
Number of page(s) 8
Section Contribution Full-Papers
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/3u3d/201202003
Published online 24 October 2012
  1. Dorffner, L. and Zöchling, A. (2003). Das 3D modell von Wien – Erzeugung und Fortführung auf Basis der Wiener Mehrzweckkarte. Proceedings of the Usage, Usability, and Utility of 3D City Models – European COST Action TU0801, pp. 161–166.
  2. Forkert, G. (2006) Modellierung und Verwaltung von U-Bahnanlagen im Rahmen des digitalen 3D Stadtmodells, in M. Schrenk (Ed.), Proceedings of the Usage, Usability, and Utility of 3D City Models – European COST Action TU0801, pp. 665–668.
  3. Döllner, J., Buchholz, H. (2005). Continuous level-of-detail modelling of buildings in 3D city models. Proceedings of the Usage, Usability, and Utility of 3D City Models – European COST Action TU0801. ACM New York.
  4. Navratil, G., Bulbul R. & Frank A.U. (2012). Maintainable City Models for Sustainable Development. Int. J. Sustainable Society, 5(2), pp. 97-113. [CrossRef]
  5. Frank, A. (2001). Tiers of ontology and consistency constraints in geographical information systems. IJGIS (Volume 15, Issue 7).
  6. Searle, J. R. (1995). The construction of social reality. USA: Simon & Schuster.
  7. Zevenbergen, J. 2002. Systems of land registration. Ph.D., Technical University, Delfts, Netherlands.
  8. Navratil, G. & Hackl, M. (2007). 3D – Kataster. Proceedings of the Usage, Usability, and Utility of 3D City Models – European COST Action TU0801.
  9. Döner, F., Thompson, R., Stoter, J., Lemmen, Ch., Ploeger, H., van Oosterom, P. & Zlatanova, S. (2010). 4D cadastres: First analysis of legal, organizational, and technical impact—With a case study on utility networks. Land Use Policy, 27(4), pp. 1068–1081, Elsevier. [CrossRef]
  10. Stoter, J., Salzmann, M. (2003). Towards a 3D cadastre: where do cadastral needs and technical possibilities meet? Elsevier, Computers environment and urban systems 27(4): 395–410. [CrossRef]
  11. Sachsenspiegel (Landrecht) (1987). Reclam Universal–Bibliothek, Nr. 3355.
  12. Twaroch, C. & Muggenhuber, G. (1997). Evolution of land registration and cadastre; Case study: Austria, Joint European conference on geographical information.
  13. Reiter, R. (1978). On closed world data bases. In H. Gallaire and J. Minker, editors, Logic and Data Bases, pp. 119–40. Plenum Publ. Co., New York.
  14. Höggerl, N. & Imrek, E. (2007). Recent Steps towards the Introduction of ETRS89 in Austria. Geodetski Vestnik, Journal of the Association of Surveyors of Slovenia 51(4): 742-750.
  15. Navratil, G., Hafner, J. & Jilin, D. (2010). Accuracy Determination for the Austrian Digital Cadastral Map (DKM). Proceedings of the Usage, Usability, and Utility of 3D City Models – European COST Action TU0801 (Medak, D., Pribicevic, B. & Delak, J., eds.), 15. – 17.2.2010, Zagreb, Croatia, pp. 171-181.
  16. Lambert, V., Frank, A. U., Cisneros, A., Sherrill, D., DeWalt, B., Abellan, A., & Uquillas, J. (1990). Ecuador Land Titling Project Evaluation. Report, Bethesda, MD, DAI, December 1990.
  17. Stoter, J. & Zevenbergen, J. (2001). Changes in the definition of property: a consideration for a 3D cadastral registration system. Proceedings FIG Working Week.
  18. Stoter, J. & van Oosterom, P. (2006). 3D Cadastre in an international context. CRC Press, Taylor & Francis, Boca Raton, NY, 323 p.

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.