Open Access
Issue
2012
Article Number 02010
Number of page(s) 11
Section Contribution Full-Papers
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/3u3d/201202010
Published online 24 October 2012
  1. Bartie, P., Reitsma, F., Clementini, E., Kingham, S., 2011, Referring Expressions in Location Based Services: The Case of the ‘Opposite’ Relation. In: Advances in Conceptual Modeling. Recent Developments and New Directions - Er 2011 Workshops - the Fifth International Workshop on Semantic and Conceptual Issues in Gis (Secogis 2011) (Ed. by O. De Troyer, C. Bauzer Medeiros, R. Billen, P. Hallot, A. Simitsis & H. Van Mingroot), LNCS 6999, 231–240. Springer-Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg
  2. Caneparo, L., Collo, M., di Giannantonio, D., Lombardo, V., Montuori, A., Pensa, S., Oct. 2007. Generating urban morphologies from ontologies. In: 2nd Workshop COST Action C21 – Towntology
  3. Brasebin, M., Perret, J., Haëck, C., Sep. 2011. Towards a 3D geographic information system for the exploration of urban rules: application to the French local urban planning schemes. In: 28th Urban Data Management Symposium (UDMS2011)
  4. Clementini, E., Tarquini, F. (2008): “Spatial relations between classes as integrity constraints”, in Transactions in GIS, 12, pp.45–58
  5. Xu, D., 2011: Design and Implementation of Constraints for 3D Spatial Database – Using Climate City Campus Database as an Example, MSc thesis, Delft University of Technology, August (2011)
  6. Bretagnolle, A., Pumain, D., 2010, Simulating urban networks through multiscalar space-time dynamics (Europe and United States, 17th–20th centuries), Urban Studies, vol.47, n 13, pp. 2819–2839
  7. Chaudhry, O., Mackaness, W., Regnauld, N. (2009): “A functional perspective on map generalisation”, in Computers, Environment and Urban Systems (CEUS), 33, pp. 349–362
  8. Clementini, E., Laurini, R. (2008) : “Un cadre conceptuel pour modéliser les relations spatiales“, in Revue des Nouvelles Technologies de l’Information (RNTI), vol. RNTI–E–14, pp. 1–17
  9. Kopczynski, M. (2006). “Efficient spatial queries with sketches”. – In: Proceedings of ISPRS Technical Commission II Symposium, Vienna, Austria
  10. Wang, J., Mülligann, C., Schwering, A (2011): “An Empirical Study on Relevant Aspects for Sketch Map Alignment”, in Usage, Usability, and Utility of 3D City Models – European COST Action TU0801 Utrecht, The Netherlands, LNGC, pp. 497–518
  11. Borrmann, A. & E. Rank, 2009: Specification and implementation of directional operators in a 3D spatial query language for building information models, in Advanced Engineering Informatics, 23 (2009), 32–44
  12. Trinh, T.-H. (2012). “A constraint-based approach to modelling spatial semantics of virtual environments”, PhD thesis of Université Européenne de Bretagne, Brest, France
  13. Kolbe, T., Gröger, G., Plümer, L. (2005): “CityGML – Interoperable Access to 3D City Models”, in: Oosterom, P., Zlatanova, S., Fendel, F. (eds), Proceedings of the International Symposium on Geo-information for Disaster Management, Springer Verlag, Delft
  14. Billen, R., Laplanche, F., Zlatanova, S., Emgard, L., 2008, Vers la génération d’un méta-modèle générique de l’information spatiale 3D urbaine, in Revue XYZ, N°114, pp. 37–42
  15. Mitra, N.J., Guibas, L., Pauly, M. (2006): “Partial and Approximate Symmetry Detection for 3D Geometry”, ACM SIGGRAPH 2006
  16. Haunert, J. A. H., 2011: Detecting Symmetries in Building Footprints by String Matching. In: S. Geertman, W. Reinhardt und F. Toppen (Eds.): Usage, Usability, and Utility of 3D City Models – European COST Action TU0801, pp. 319–336. Springer, Berlin, Germany
  17. Kieler B. (2007): “A geometry-driven approach for the semantic integration of geodata sets”, 23rd International Cartographic Conference (ICC’07), Moscow, Russia
  18. Pauly, M., Mitra, N.J., Wallner, J., Pottmann, H., Guibas, L.J. (2008): “Discovering Structural Regularity in 3D Geometry”, ACM Transactions on Graphics (Proceedings of SIGGRAPH)
  19. Heinzle, F., Anders, K.-H. (2007): “Characterising Space via Pattern Recognition Techniques: Identifying Patterns in Road Networks”. In: Generalisation of Geographic Information: Cartographic Modelling and Applications, Mackaness, W., Ruas, A., & Sarjakoski, T. (ed.), published on behalf of the International Cartographic Association by Elsevier, p. 233–253
  20. Ripperda, N., Brenner, C. (2009): “Application of a Formal Grammar to Facade Reconstruction in Semiautomatic and Automatic Environments”, Usage, Usability, and Utility of 3D City Models – European COST Action TU0801, Hannover, Germany
  21. Huang, H., C. Brenner, Sester, M. (2011): “3D Building Roof Reconstruction from Point Clouds via Generative Models”, 19th ACM SIGSPATIAL International Conference on Advances in Geographic Information Systems (GIS), p. 16–24
  22. Klien, E. and Lutz, M. (2005). The Role of Spatial Relations in Automating the Semantic Annotation of Geodata. In Cohn, A. and Mark, D., editors, Spatial Information Theory: InternationalConference, COSIT 2005, Ellicottville, NY, USA, September 14–18, 2005, LectureNotes in Computer Science (LNCS), p. 133–148. Springer
  23. Gaffuri J. (2007): “Outflow preservation of the hydrographic network on the relief in map generalisation”, 23rd International Cartographic Conference (ICC’07), 4–10 August, Moscow, Russia
  24. Mackaness, W., A. (2007): “Understanding geographic space”, in Generalisation of Geographic Information: Cartographic Modelling and Applications, Mackaness and Ruas (eds), Elsevier
  25. Burghardt, D., Schmid, S., Stoter, J., 2007. Investigations on cartographic constraint formalisation. In: 10th ICA Workshop on Generalisation and Multiple Representations
  26. Kada M (2007) Scale-Dependent Simplification of 3D Building Models Based on Cell Decomposition and Primitive Instancing. In: COSIT 2007, p. 222–237
  27. Berdier, C. & Roussey, C. (2006) Urban Ontologies: The Towntology Prototype towards Case Studies. Workshop of COST Action C21 Towntology – Ontologies for Urban Development: Interfacing Urban Information Systems. Université de Genève, 91–102
  28. Parent, C., Spaccapietra, S., Zimanyi, E. (2006): “Conceptual Modelling for Traditional and Spatio-Temporal Applications – the Mads Approach”. Springer, Berlin
  29. Clementini, E. (2010): “Ontological Impedance in 3D Semantic Data Modeling” In: 5th 3d Geoinfo Conference (Ed. by T. H. Kolbe, G. König & C. Nagel), ISPRS Conference vol. XXXVIII–4, part W15, 97-100. ISPRS, 3–4 November 2010, Berlin, Germany
  30. Clementini, E. (2012) Directional Relations and Frames of Reference. GeoInformatica, doi: 10.1007/s10707-011-0147-2
  31. Retz-Schmidt, G. (1988) Various Views on Spatial Prepositions. AI Magazine, 9, 95–105
  32. Clementini, E. & Billen, R. (2006) Modeling and Computing Ternary Projective Relations between Regions. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, 18, 799–814 [CrossRef]
  33. Egenhofer, M.J. & Franzosa, R.D. (1991) Point-Set Topological Spatial Relations. International Journal of Geographical Information Systems, 5, 161–174 [CrossRef]
  34. Frank, A.U. (1982) Mapquery: Data Base Query Language for Retrieval of Geometric Data and Their Graphical Representation. ACM Computer Graphics, 16, 199–207
  35. Güting, R.H. (1988) Geo-Relational Algebra: A Model and Query Language for Geometric Database Systems. In: Usage, Usability, and Utility of 3D City Models – European COST Action TU0801, March 14–18, 1988, Venice, Italy (Ed. by J. W. Schmidt, S. Ceri & M. Missikoff), LNCS, 303, 506–527. Springer-Verlag, Berlin
  36. Herring, J. (1991) Tigris: A Data Model for an Object-Oriented Geographic Information System. Computers and Geosciences, 18, 443–452
  37. Cardenas, A.F., Ieong, I.T., Taira, R.K., Barker, R. & Breant, C.M. (1993) The Knowledge-Based Object-Oriented Picquery + Language. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, 5, 644–657 [CrossRef]
  38. OGC Open Geospatial Consortium Inc. (2006) Opengis®Implementation Specification for Geographic Information – Simple Feature Access – Part 2: Sql Option. OGC 06–104r3, 110
  39. Clementini, E., Di Felice, P. & van Oosterom, P. (1993) A Small Set of Formal Topological Relationships Suitable for End-User Interaction. In: Advances in Spatial Databases – Third International Symposium, Ssd ’93 (Ed. by D. Abel & B. C. Ooi), Lncs, 692, 277–295. Springer-Verlag, Berlin [CrossRef]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.