EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Year: 2012 10.1051/3u3d/201202003 References
Open Access
Issue
2012
Article Number 02003
Number of page(s) 8
Section Contribution Full-Papers
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/3u3d/201202003
Published online 24 October 2012
  1. Dorffner, L. and Zöchling, A. (2003). Das 3D modell von Wien – Erzeugung und Fortführung auf Basis der Wiener Mehrzweckkarte. Proceedings of the Usage, Usability, and Utility of 3D City Models – European COST Action TU0801, pp. 161–166. [Google Scholar]
  2. Forkert, G. (2006) Modellierung und Verwaltung von U-Bahnanlagen im Rahmen des digitalen 3D Stadtmodells, in M. Schrenk (Ed.), Proceedings of the Usage, Usability, and Utility of 3D City Models – European COST Action TU0801, pp. 665–668. [Google Scholar]
  3. Döllner, J., Buchholz, H. (2005). Continuous level-of-detail modelling of buildings in 3D city models. Proceedings of the Usage, Usability, and Utility of 3D City Models – European COST Action TU0801. ACM New York. [Google Scholar]
  4. Navratil, G., Bulbul R. & Frank A.U. (2012). Maintainable City Models for Sustainable Development. Int. J. Sustainable Society, 5(2), pp. 97-113. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. Frank, A. (2001). Tiers of ontology and consistency constraints in geographical information systems. IJGIS (Volume 15, Issue 7). [Google Scholar]
  6. Searle, J. R. (1995). The construction of social reality. USA: Simon & Schuster. [Google Scholar]
  7. Zevenbergen, J. 2002. Systems of land registration. Ph.D., Technical University, Delfts, Netherlands. [Google Scholar]
  8. Navratil, G. & Hackl, M. (2007). 3D – Kataster. Proceedings of the Usage, Usability, and Utility of 3D City Models – European COST Action TU0801. [Google Scholar]
  9. Döner, F., Thompson, R., Stoter, J., Lemmen, Ch., Ploeger, H., van Oosterom, P. & Zlatanova, S. (2010). 4D cadastres: First analysis of legal, organizational, and technical impact—With a case study on utility networks. Land Use Policy, 27(4), pp. 1068–1081, Elsevier. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. Stoter, J., Salzmann, M. (2003). Towards a 3D cadastre: where do cadastral needs and technical possibilities meet? Elsevier, Computers environment and urban systems 27(4): 395–410. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. Sachsenspiegel (Landrecht) (1987). Reclam Universal–Bibliothek, Nr. 3355. [Google Scholar]
  12. Twaroch, C. & Muggenhuber, G. (1997). Evolution of land registration and cadastre; Case study: Austria, Joint European conference on geographical information. [Google Scholar]
  13. Reiter, R. (1978). On closed world data bases. In H. Gallaire and J. Minker, editors, Logic and Data Bases, pp. 119–40. Plenum Publ. Co., New York. [Google Scholar]
  14. Höggerl, N. & Imrek, E. (2007). Recent Steps towards the Introduction of ETRS89 in Austria. Geodetski Vestnik, Journal of the Association of Surveyors of Slovenia 51(4): 742-750. [Google Scholar]
  15. Navratil, G., Hafner, J. & Jilin, D. (2010). Accuracy Determination for the Austrian Digital Cadastral Map (DKM). Proceedings of the Usage, Usability, and Utility of 3D City Models – European COST Action TU0801 (Medak, D., Pribicevic, B. & Delak, J., eds.), 15. – 17.2.2010, Zagreb, Croatia, pp. 171-181. [Google Scholar]
  16. Lambert, V., Frank, A. U., Cisneros, A., Sherrill, D., DeWalt, B., Abellan, A., & Uquillas, J. (1990). Ecuador Land Titling Project Evaluation. Report, Bethesda, MD, DAI, December 1990. [Google Scholar]
  17. Stoter, J. & Zevenbergen, J. (2001). Changes in the definition of property: a consideration for a 3D cadastral registration system. Proceedings FIG Working Week. [Google Scholar]
  18. Stoter, J. & van Oosterom, P. (2006). 3D Cadastre in an international context. CRC Press, Taylor & Francis, Boca Raton, NY, 323 p. [Google Scholar]