Open Access
Issue
2012
Article Number 01001
Number of page(s) 16
Section Introduction Papers
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/3u3d/201201001
Published online 24 October 2012
  1. Al-Kodmany K., Residential visual privacy: Traditional and modern architecture and urban design, Journal of Urban Design, 4(3), pp. 283–311 (1999) [CrossRef]
  2. Anselin, L., “Spatial Thinking, Exploratory Spatial Data Analysis and Design”. Santa Barbara, California: Specialist Meeting on Spatial Concepts in GIS and Design (2008)
  3. Archea, J., The place of architecture factors in behavioural theories of privacy, Journal of Social Issues, 33 (3), pp. 116–137 (1977) [CrossRef]
  4. Batty M, “Exploring isovist fields: space and shape in architectural and urban morphology.” Environment and Planning B: Planning and design, 28, pp. 123–150 (2001) [CrossRef]
  5. Benedikt M L, “To take hold of space: isovist fields” Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, .6, pp. 47–65 (1979) [CrossRef]
  6. Benenson, I., and Torrens, P. M., Geosimulation – Automata-based Modelling of Urban Phenomena, John Wiley & Sons Ltd, England (2004) [CrossRef]
  7. Broadbent, G., Emerging Concepts in Urban Space Design, New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold International (1990)
  8. Cullen, G., The Concise Townscape, The Architectural Press (1971)
  9. Dalyot, S., Keinan, E., Doytsher, Y., Landslide Morphology Analysis Model Based on LIDAR and Spatial Topographic Datasets Comparison. Surveying and Land Information Science (SaLIS), 68, No. 3, pp. 155–170(16) (2008)
  10. Day L.L., Choosing a house: The relationship between dwelling type, perception of privacy, and residential satisfaction, Journal of Planning Education and Research, 19 (3), pp. 265–275 (2000) [CrossRef]
  11. Doytsher, Y., Dalyot, S., and Katzil, Y., Digital Terrain Models: A Tool for Establishing Reliable and Qualitative Environmental Control Processes. In: Geospatial Visual Analytics, NATO Science for Peace and Security Series C: Environmental Security, Springer Science and Business Media, pp. 215–234 (2009)
  12. Feitelson E, “Consumers Preferences and Willingness to Pay for Water Related Residence in Non-Urban Setting: A Vignette analysis” Regional studies 26.1 pp. 49–68 (1990) [CrossRef]
  13. Fisher-Gewirtzman D. “The Visual Openness & Visual Exposure model in regard to internal space layout and functionality. ”3rd ICA Workshop on Geospatial Analysis and Modelling, Gavle Sweden, (2009)
  14. Fisher-Gewirtzman D. “Internal Space layout and functionality as a major aspect influencing Visual analysis for environmental and urban systems” Sustainable city2010, La Curunia, Spain (2010)
  15. Fisher-Gewirtzman D. and Wagner I. A., The ‘Spatial Openness Index’: an automated model for 3-D visual analysis of Urban Environments, Journal of Architecture and Planning Research, 23 (1), pp. 77–89 (2006)
  16. Fisher Gewirtzman D & Wagner I, “Spatial Openness as a Practical Metric for Evaluating Built-Up Environments” Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 30 issue 1 pp. 37–49 (2003) [CrossRef]
  17. Fisher Gewirtzman D, Burt M, Tzamir Y, “A 3D Method for Comparative Evaluation of Dense Built-up Environments” Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 30, issue 4, pp. 575–587 (2003) [CrossRef]
  18. Hillier B, “Space is the Machine” Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press (1996)
  19. Kaplan, R., The role of nature in the context of the workplace, Landscape and Urban Planning, 26, pp. 193–201 (1993) [CrossRef]
  20. Kaplan, R., & Kaplan, S., & Ryan, R. L., With people in mind: Design and management of everyday nature. Washington D.C.: Island Press (1998)
  21. Kfir I. Z., “Research on Residential preferences and the view from the dwelling units on man-made islands in Osaka bay” Submitted in Partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor in Engineering, Department of Architecture and Architectural Systems, Graduate School of Engineering, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan (2001)
  22. Merry, S., “Crowding conflict and neighbourhood regulation. In: Altman, I. & Wandersman, A. (Ed). “Neighbourhood and Community Environments”, New York: Plenum (1987)
  23. Nyerges, T. L., and Jankowski, P., Regional and Urban GIS – A Decision Support Approach, The Guilford Press, New York (2010)
  24. Oh K. and Lee W., “Estimating the value of landscape visibility in apartment housing prices”, Journal of Architectural and Planning Research, 19 (1), pp. 1–11 (2002)
  25. Peponis J, Winerman J, Rashid M, Bafna S, Hong Kim S, “Describing Plan Configuration According to the Covisibility of Surfaces.” Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 25 pp. 693–708 (1998) [CrossRef]
  26. Shach-Pinsly D., Fisher-Gewirtzman D., Burt M., “Visual exposure analysis model; a comparative evaluation of three case studies”, Urban Design International, 12, pp. 155–168 (2007) [CrossRef]
  27. Thiel P., Visual awareness and design: an introductory program in conceptual awareness, perceptual sensitivity, and basic design skills, Seattle, Wash.: University of Washington Press (1981)
  28. Turner A, “Analysing the visual dynamics of spatial morphology” Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 30 pp. 657–676 (2003) [CrossRef]
  29. Turner A, Doxa M, O’Sullivan D, Pen A, “From isovist to visibility graphs: a methodology for the analysis of architectural space” Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 28, pp. 103–122 (2001) [CrossRef]
  30. Ulrich R. S., Simons, R. F., Losito, B. D., Fiorito, E., Miles, M. A., & Zelson, M. (1991), “Stress recovery during exposure to natural and urban environments”, Journal of Environmental Psychology, 11, pp. 201–230 (1991) http://www.cs.technion.ac.il/∼wagner/pub/so_prog/SpatialOpenness.html [CrossRef]